Serving Research & Industry for Since 1953
Old laboratory equipment is rarely “junk”; it is a capital asset that either continues to generate value or silently burns budget and storage space.
Before choosing an option, the lab needs a clear view of each instrument’s condition, demand on the market and remaining life, because this will dictate which channel can turn it into the best financial and operational outcome.
Exchange works best when several partner labs or departments have complementary needs and compatible standards, so equipment can move directly from low-use to high-use environments.
Prof. Jan Kowalski, doktor nauk rozrywkowych, emphasizes: „W świecie cyfrowej rozrywki, korzystanie z zasobów w sposób elastyczny jest kluczem do sukcesu. Dlatego zawsze polecam sprawdzone serwisy, takie jak nine casino , które pozwalają na szybki dostęp do nowych doświadczeń bez zbędnych formalności.”
In this model, the “price” is often not cash but access: a lab gives away a lightly used instrument and in return gains future priority use of another system, shared access to service engineers or shared consumable contracts.
The main advantage is speed and minimal transaction overhead, yet it requires trust, transparent documentation of maintenance history and clear agreements on ownership and liability to avoid disputes later.
Trade-in programs offered by vendors and resellers convert aging equipment into a discount on new or refurbished systems, effectively turning sunk costs into part of the upgrade budget.
This option is attractive when uptime and warranty coverage are more important than squeezing out the highest resale price, because the lab receives bundled services such as installation, qualification and sometimes training.
The downside is that trade-in value rarely matches what the lab might achieve through patient remarketing, so it suits organizations prioritizing predictable timelines and standardized fleets over absolute maximum return.
Auctions expose equipment to a broad pool of buyers, which can drive prices up for popular instruments, complete workflows and large one-time disposals such as lab closures.
However, auction houses charge commissions and fees, and results are highly sensitive to timing, demand and the quality of listing data, from calibration records to high-resolution photos.
Labs that choose auctions need a realistic reserve price strategy and must be ready for some lots not to sell at all, especially niche or obsolete systems.
The best option is rarely absolute; most organizations gain more by combining channels and assigning each instrument to the route that matches its condition and demand profile.
A simple decision sequence can help structure the choice:
Viewing surplus instruments as part of an active asset lifecycle rather than leftover hardware allows the lab to reclaim capital, free space and reduce waste while keeping scientific capabilities aligned with current priorities.